“Joseph Plazo on the Dangers of Algorithmic Obedience: Who Controls the Machine?”
“Joseph Plazo on the Dangers of Algorithmic Obedience: Who Controls the Machine?”
Blog Article
At a regional summit of Asia’s most promising technocrats and business students, Joseph Plazo—founder of the algorithmic trading firm Plazo Sullivan Roche—offered an unusual message: slow down.
MANILA — What he offered instead was something rarely heard in AI circles: resistance.
“Profit isn’t the only thing on the line. So is principle.”
???? **Joseph Plazo: A Technologist Sounding the Alarm**
Plazo is not new to this space. His firm’s AI systems have posted a 99% win rate across key timeframes and are in use by institutional clients across Europe and Asia.
Yet even with these results, he insists—performance isn’t the only metric.
“Optimisation is only part of the equation,” Plazo explained. “Direction, purpose—those remain human.”
He shared a case from the early days of the pandemic. One of his firm’s bots flagged a short on gold just before the U.S. Federal Reserve issued an emergency policy shift.
“We overrode it. The algorithm was correct—but profoundly unaware.”
???? **When Pausing Is a Form of Leadership**
Traders are trained to move quickly—too quickly.
“In high-volatility moments, the pause is where leadership happens.”
Plazo introduced a framework he calls **“Conviction Calculus”**—three questions that must be asked before executing an AI recommendation:
- Are we outsourcing our ethics to an equation?
- Are we listening to voices that can’t be graphed?
- Will anyone say, ‘This was my call,’ or just point at the machine?
???? **The Bigger Picture: website Asia’s Tech Acceleration and the Governance Gap**
Across Asia, nations are investing heavily in fintech and AI-driven innovation. From Singapore to South Korea, the push toward automation is framed as economic strategy.
But Plazo’s question cuts deeper: “We’re scaling faster than we’re thinking.”
He warned of systems designed to win—but not to pause.
“These weren’t errors of greed or emotion. They were perfectly logical moves—executed without context.”
???? **A New Path: Machines That Listen as Well as Compute**
Plazo is not anti-AI. He’s pro-responsibility.
His firm is developing what he calls **“narrative-integrated AI”**—models that factor in geopolitics, tone, and social context alongside market data.
“We don’t need more speed. We need better questions.”
That idea is already drawing attention.
One investor called Plazo’s talk:
“A necessary reckoning for financial technology.”
???? **The Final Warning: Crashes Don’t Always Start Loudly**
Plazo ended with a thought that may echo across boardrooms:
“Emotion won’t trigger the fall. Certainty will.”
It wasn’t fearmongering. It was foresight.
Because when machines take over the trades, conscience cannot be coded out.